BOOK

2009-12-19T12:02:00.563+02:00

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/3843365121/ref=nosim/gettexbooks-20

my book : Modified Hawking Field .Metrical analysis in cosmology,ISBN 978-3-8433-6512-3

Author: Alexandris Nikos
e-mail: alexandrisn@yahoo.com

My favorite function is that gives mass of electron for temperature of CMBR(2.73Kelvin).
For 5 times Hawking-Planck mass and length lT=λ/2π , it gives temperature Planck .

For 40TeV it gives temperature of gluon plasma (1.6x1012 , 1.6E12 Kelvin) ,RHIC 2005-7* and for length lT = lg (gravitational length) it gives temperature 4 trilions Kelvin ,RHIC 2010 .

lengths λ = 2πlc , lg = sqrt(2π)lc
pages 36 and 52

corrections of my book:
http://www.worldsci.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6336.pdf

(*) RHIC collider's temperature : http://wbabin.net/files/4570_alexandris2.pdf

(**)Also the function of core of stars(central temperature) m = 10^-3 .T^2 . l^2 seems to work in colliders
m : mass-energy , T: temperature , l : length of crash or particle's length

Book

The way of algebra 's solutions has three problems :

1. The mass Meg51a that is about 5 times more than Hawking's mass-energy(4.85x1E17.GeV/c2).Hawking modified Stoney's mass(1874) to be in agreement with length Planck and he found a smaler mass.
Stoneys's mass Meg51b must have a strange angular momentum by a middle expotential mass to be in agreement with length Planck , but arises my mass Meg51a that is more productive in nuclear particles than Stoney's mass.That's was the reason of rejection of Stoney's mass Meg51b .Stoney's mass works also with empirical functions.Stoney's mass=Meg51a/sqrt(2π)=2 Ηawking mass
"Coyne and Cheng's paper perhaps includes the number 5 "

2.Algebra solutions demand to modify Wien's law(but agree with CMBR and Stefan-Boltzman's law in some way).Also modified Wien's law in CMBR gives to Stefan-Boltzman's law a coeficient of surface 64π2 , the same coeficient with mass Planck^2/mass Hawking^2 .So modified Wien's law has the hope to remain , to be out of rejection .Coeficient of shape and some fine structure linked .Is that the request of Wheeler for a unification theory between relativity and quantomechanics(**) ?

3.Coeficients that I choosed arised from empirical types which I found by Excel

To be accepted all algebra must be experementently correct 4 equations :

1. π*(above,RHIC)
2.solar rotation period (ten times less,perhaps rotation of core is 10 times faster than the surface) *
3.temperature of core of Sun(has good aproximation)
4. Modified Wien's law.

So we have two functions(1,4) out of standard model and two functions(2,3) in agreement with standard model.

NEW

Application in standard model

SOLAR DYNAMO , A DYNAMIC MODEL OF SUN

(*) Also it is predicted Sun's intensity of current 2x10^7 .Ampere and by dimensional application with some aproximation arises magnetic field 70x10^-4 .Tesla = 70 Gauss (it depends on shape of currents) , pages 55-56.Hypothesis of Alfven-Carlqvist(1967) also Stepanov-Zaitsev(Plasma theory).70 Gauss is 14 times more than the magnetic field of Sun's surface .The analogy is close to solar rotation , so we have the hope to predict the state of cores of stars .
If we consider that current is a cycle with radius the radius of core : 1/5 of radius of Sun then the intensity of magnetic field is 46Gauss .At surface that intensity will be 10 times less or 4.6Gauss.
Number 10 is the analogy of solar rotation between core and surface .Period is inversely proportionaly of intensity of magnetic field(force Laplace could be centripetal force).

My book could had titled modified Alfven's field .All basic analysis based to that hypothesis(plasma theory with high density of mater).Alfven , nobel prize 1970.But I choose Hawking because of functions that are out of standard model and I impressed of them .

paper : http://wbabin.net/Science-Journals-Papers/Type/Communications

The mathematical approach concerns extreme(Susskind term) black-holes , but it exists a problem of what is a black hole.Black holes resemble cores of stars .
My approach gives entropy not zero , varius temperatures and extreme differences between cores and surfaces of that bodies.The only problem is the schwarzschild radius that comes of a law of mechanics .
How can light to escape of supermasive stars ? Could a law of physics to described complex phenomena ?
I believe that the function of schwarzschild is in force , but other law allows the light to escape and that conclusion comes of Sagittarius A* .If Sagittarius A* is Black Hole then schwarzschild radius can not describe it's self a Black Hole .

(**)Connection with Hawking theory

1. Coeficient of surface of orizon(θs) is number 25 .That result arises by modified Wien's law in Coulomb length lc and two functions of Hawkinng : radiation and orizon ,
Wc/THawking.Rorizon=5 , Wc=T.lc , sqrt(θs)=5 ,R:radius of orizon ,T:temperature .
Number 1/25 is the fine structure of messon of Higgs (read corrections on NPA).

2. The function of core of stars has good approximation with emission of Sagittarius A* .We introduce the mass of Sagittarius A* , the radius of that and arises the temperature of core of Sagittarius A*.

Also it seems that the function is combined with two functions of Hawking : orizon and temperature . My function in temperature of Planck gives the radius of orizon and arises the mass of black hole that is the Hawking's mass for black hole .The emission of that body is 100 times than Saggittarius A* .If that emission exists in the center of Saggittarius A* , that is the Hawking 's radiation .
m = 10^-3 .T^2 . l^2
m : mass-energy , T: temperature of core of star , l : length of radius of the body

The function of temperature of core of stars(central temperature) seems to be appropriate in colliders .My function for 7TeV gives length 10^-21m , for temperature 10^11Kelvin .
m = 10^-3 .T^2 . l^2
m : mass-energy , T: temperature , l : length of crash or particle's length .

Cosmological problems

1. The problem is that orizon in Sagittarius A* (orizon must be in center , core of Sagittarius A*) will have radius of an atom and that is not accepted of cosmologists , who believe to an orizon enourmus great .Only the mass of Big Bang could have radius of an atom (Lemaitre-Friedmann 1927).So Hawking's theory is logic in astrophysics if we plus one more function , but cosmologists will not accept the results easy .
Also general relativity stop in radius of an atom and only quantomechanics can explain that bodies , that is the standard model in physics .
Only a scientific revolution could solve the contradiction .

2. For colliders the question is : exist gravitation force there ? π* has.
Standard model deny any significant participation of gravitation force in atoms.That is the greatest problem of any function and famous theory .Most scientists believe to gravity in atoms by new famous theories , but there is not nobel prize for that .String theory , Hawking theory , SUSY theory , Higgs theory wait more than 40 years for verification .I believe that Stoney's mass has also the possιbility to exist in future science after 137 years of rejection .
So we wait .

Philosophical problem

Any successfull function that not belongs to Standard model is an empirical function , not law .
Science community prefer some approximation in standard model than a very good or perfect approximation out of standard model.

Experimental problem

All theories have been unsuccesful at CERN .

COSMOLOGY BOOK

BOOK